Melbourne Mercer: Netherlands beats Denmark as world's top system
The Netherlands pipped Denmark to the top spot in Melbourne Mercerâs tenth annual benchmarking of pension systems from across the world.
Finland displaced Australia for third place, while Sweden came in fifth.
Scoring 80.3 and 80.2, respectively, the Netherlands and Denmark were the only two countries that obtained an A-grade of their pension systems in this yearâs Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index.
Published by the Australian Centre for Financial Studies in collaboration with Mercer, the index measured 34 pension systems against more than 40 indicators to gauge their adequacy, sustainability and integrity.
Germany came in first class for adequacy, Denmark first for sustainability, and Finland first for integrity.
According to a statement, this yearâs index revealed growing tension between adequacy and sustainability, particularly in Europe.
Denmark, the Netherlands and Sweden scored A or B grades for both criteria, while Austria, Italy and Spain were graded B for adequacy but obtained the lowest grade â" E â" for sustainability.
David Knox, senior partner at Mercer Australia and author of the study, said that the natural starting place to having a world class pension system was ensuring the right balance between adequacy and sustainability.
âItâs a challenge that policymakers are grappling with,â he said.
Coverage and the proportion of the adult population participating in a pensions system was âan emerging dimension to the debate about what constitutes a world class system,â however.
UK languishes, Spain debuts with a âCâ
The UKâs overall score improved marginally on last year, mainly as a result of the increase in the level of auto-enrolment contributions, but did not mo ve from the 15th place it fell to in the 2017 overall ranking.
According to a statement, the score for the countryâs pension system continued to be weighed down by factors such as relatively low levels of provision offered to the poorest people and the self-employed, and the introduction of pension freedoms.
France joined the UK in the C+ ranks this year, having been scored C in last yearâs index.
Its index value increased from 59.6 in 2017 to 60.7 in 2018 primarily due to increased coverage in private pension plans and increased participation in the labour force at older ages. The state pension age (62) and the level of funded contributions were among factors holding back the countryâs overall score, however.
Italy was once again the lowest scoring European country, with Austria also still scoring a C grade, indicating âa system that has some good features, but also has major risks and/or shortcomings that should be addressedâ.
Spain made its debut in the index with a C, and 54.4 points. It was among four new systems analysed in the report, alongside Hong Kong, Peru and Saudi Arabia.
According to the index report, Spainâs overall index value could be increased by:
- increasing coverage of employees in occupational pension schemes through automatic membership or enrolment, thereby increasing the level of contributions and assets;
- increasing the labour force participation rate at older ages as life expectancies rise; and
- raising the level of household saving.
|Country||2018 score||2018 grade||2017 score (ranking)||2016 score (ranking)|
|1||Netherlands||80.3||A||78.8 (2)||80.1 (2)|
|2||Denmark||80.2||A||78.9 (1)||80.5 (1)|
|3||Finland||74.5||B||72.3 (5)||72.9 (4)|
|4||Australia||72.6||B||77.1 (3)||77.9 (3)|
|5||Sweden||72.5||B||72.0 (6)||71.4 (5)|
|7||Singapore||70.4||B||69.4 (7)||67.0 (7)|
|8||Chile||69.3||B||67.3 (10)||66.4 (=8)|
|9||New Zealand||68.5||B||67.4 (9)||n/a|
|10||Canada||68.0||B||66.8 (11)||66.4 (=8)|
|11||Switzerland||67.6||B||67.6 (8)||68.6 (6 )|
|=12||Ireland||66.8||B||65.8 (12)||62.0 (10)|
|=12||Germany||66.8||B||63.5 (13)||59.0 (12)|
|15||UK||62.5||C+||61.4 (15)||60.1 (11)|
|17||France||60.7||C+||59.6 (16)||56.4 (=13)|
|19||US||58.8||C||57.8 (17)||56.4 (=13)|
|20||Malaysia||58.5||C||57.7 (18)||55.7 (15)|
|21||Brazil||56.5||C||54.8 (20)||55.1 (16)|
|24||Poland||54.3||C||55.1 (19)||54.4 (17)|
|25||Austria||54.0||C||53.1 (21)||51.7 (18)|
|26||Indonesia||53.1||C||49.9 (23)||48.3 (21)|
|27||Italy||52.8||C||50.8 (22)||49.5 (19)|
|28||South Africa||52.7||C||48.9 (24)||48.6 (20)|
|29||Japan||48.2||D||43.5 (29)||43.2 (26)|
|30||Korea||47.3||D||47.1 (25)||46.0 (22)|
|31||China||46.2||D||46.5 (26)||45.2 (23)|
|32||Mexico||45.3||D||45.1 (27)||44.3 (24)|
|33||India||44.6||D||44.9 (28)||43.4 (25)|
|34||Argentina||39.2||D||38.8 (30)||37.7 (27)|
Netherlands scores lowest on âretirement happinessâ â" study
Thu, 11 Oct 2018
PensionsEuropeâs chair on Brexit, retire ment age and Dutch reform
Fri, 28 Sep 2018
Book Review: Pension lessons from abroad
April 2018 (magazine)
Global pension ranking: Europeâs pension systems fail to make A-grade in global index
December 2017 (Magazine)
Melbourne Mercer: Pension systems fail to make the A-grade
Mon, 23 Oct 2017
Melbourne Mercer Global Pension Index: The underestimated impact of ageing
December 2016 (Magazine)